This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ghai, A. Articles by Johri, R. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Prenatal Diagnosis

Where Do We Draw the Line?

Anita Ghai is Reader, Department of Psychology, Jesus and Mary College, University of Delhi, Delhi. E-mail: anita.satyapal{at}gmail.com.

Rachana Johri

Rachana Johri is Reader, Department of Psychology, Lady Shri Ram College for Women, University of Delhi, Delhi. E-mail: rachanajohri{at}hotmail.com.

Feminists in India have been concerned about the declining sex ratio in the country. The Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act 1994 or PNDT Act, which outlaws sex-selective abortions, has been welcomed by feminists, even though they remain concerned with bottlenecks in its implementation. A relatively unnoticed but critical issue, however, is the possibly unwitting legitimisation of the abortion of potentially disabled children. This article endeavours to question the ideology that regards abortion as the only option when prenatal testing reveals a birth abnormality, an option sanctioned by the PNDT Act. We contend that disability is, to a great extent, socially constructed: its conceptualisation reflects societal attitudes that view the lives of disabled people as tragic, worthless and a burden. The article recognises the tension between the feminist and disability activists around the issue of women's choice. These issues are discussed through the voices of the mothers of both non-disabled and disabled children in Delhi. We contend that: (a) the concept of individual choice, which is reified through the PNDT Act, is socially constructed and contextually located, and (b) while a pro-choice perspective is important to feminists, the thoughtless use of prenatal testing could reduce, rather than expand, women's choices.

Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, 291-316 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/097152150801500205


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?